16-01-2023, 07:18 PM
I have now read and understood everything. But I don't understand what you're getting at.
I assume that Lisa Fagin Davis is right in her assumption that there are 5 writers. It doesn't matter whether there are 4 or 6. I will assume that there are 5 writers.
I will now take 5 texts with 5 different languages. Example: Norwegian, Albanian, Turkish, French and Spanish.
As long as I don't understand any language, they are all the same. They tell me nothing and therefore have no meaning for me.
I can't establish a connection between the languages either.
But in the VM there is a connection. The same words are used again and again, regardless of the hand.
Since everyone uses the same thing over and over again, one can speak of a system, even if one doesn't understand it.
Now I ask myself again, what do you actually want to prove with the algorithms and programmes? Something that is actually clear when you think about it.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)
I assume that Lisa Fagin Davis is right in her assumption that there are 5 writers. It doesn't matter whether there are 4 or 6. I will assume that there are 5 writers.
I will now take 5 texts with 5 different languages. Example: Norwegian, Albanian, Turkish, French and Spanish.
As long as I don't understand any language, they are all the same. They tell me nothing and therefore have no meaning for me.
I can't establish a connection between the languages either.
But in the VM there is a connection. The same words are used again and again, regardless of the hand.
Since everyone uses the same thing over and over again, one can speak of a system, even if one doesn't understand it.
Now I ask myself again, what do you actually want to prove with the algorithms and programmes? Something that is actually clear when you think about it.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)