11-01-2023, 02:17 PM
I first had to translate the letter and study it properly.
How I understood it:
So far, one can say that single VM words can be translated into many different languages. Let's just take one language and call it "xyz".
Now I have many words from "xyz" but still they don't make sense when strung together as text.
We had the same thing on page 116. These Latin-like words didn't make sense either. It took a lot of time to form a comprehensible story without getting away from the words. The basis of the dictionaries was classical Latin, but it could only be applied to the dialect with difficulty. Whereas the German text, although a little strange, is clear. (At least for me, since dialect is familiar).
What does it look like when the whole book is written like that, and now encoded?
Moreover, I have to say that the examinations were partly done in EVA. On the other hand, with Stolfi. Here you have to know that EVA is blind and other transcriptions are short-sighted.
How I understood it:
So far, one can say that single VM words can be translated into many different languages. Let's just take one language and call it "xyz".
Now I have many words from "xyz" but still they don't make sense when strung together as text.
We had the same thing on page 116. These Latin-like words didn't make sense either. It took a lot of time to form a comprehensible story without getting away from the words. The basis of the dictionaries was classical Latin, but it could only be applied to the dialect with difficulty. Whereas the German text, although a little strange, is clear. (At least for me, since dialect is familiar).
What does it look like when the whole book is written like that, and now encoded?
Moreover, I have to say that the examinations were partly done in EVA. On the other hand, with Stolfi. Here you have to know that EVA is blind and other transcriptions are short-sighted.