29-11-2022, 08:33 PM
(29-11-2022, 07:17 PM)R. Sale wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I don't know if that one would count, it looks plain weird.
This highlights a point though. Koen has written about other fashions that he says the absence of which in the Zodiac drawings point to a pre-1430, but from what I can tell he hasn't really specified.
He says: "The hulk-look became the norm after bag-pipes went out of style. It’s easy to recognize and was avoided for this study."
It would be interesting to see data and examples of the "hulk-look" to verify this claim. It should certainly not have been avoid as part of the study, if it really is the alternative to the baggy sleeves.

