Are the 1430s the most likely date range for the Zodiac drawings?
#95
(29-11-2022, 07:17 PM)R. Sale wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

I don't know if that one would count, it looks plain weird.

This highlights a point though. Koen has written about other fashions that he says the absence of which in the Zodiac drawings point to a pre-1430, but from what I can tell he hasn't really specified.

He says: "The hulk-look became the norm after bag-pipes went out of style. It’s easy to recognize and was avoided for this study."

It would be interesting to see data and examples of the "hulk-look" to verify this claim. It should certainly not have been avoid as part of the study, if it really is the alternative to the baggy sleeves.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Are the 1430s the most likely date range for the Zodiac drawings? - by Mark Knowles - 29-11-2022, 08:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)