Are the 1430s the most likely date range for the Zodiac drawings?
#49
(26-11-2022, 02:05 PM)davidjackson wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Mark, can you please respond in fewer threads. This scattergun approach not only makes it impossible for us to keep up with your arguments, it also stops people from replying to earlier threads because they get lost. It might not be your intention, but you hit these threads with a machinegun spray of posts, and the end result is that people can't keep up, lose interest and wander off.
It also lowers your argument by making it look like a stream of consciousness, kneejerk stream of replies instead of a measured response.

I am sorry for that. Do you have any suggestions as frequently I comment from my mobile phone and I find it very easy to lose comments whilst I am mid-way through them if I have to answer a phone call or look at an urgent email or just want to Google to check something? An automatic refresh or a careless click and I have to retype the whole comment.
Sometimes, like with my first comment on this thread I type it into a word document first, which I save, and then I copy and paste it into a Voynich Ninja comment. However this approach, whilst it does prevent, me from losing my comment is slower and more laborious.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Are the 1430s the most likely date range for the Zodiac drawings? - by Mark Knowles - 26-11-2022, 02:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)