Are the 1430s the most likely date range for the Zodiac drawings?

[Mark Knowles]

this kind of flurry of posts all in a row

The reason is simple. Just, because I have plenty to say on the subject. I often find it easier sometimes to break things up into smaller comments than one big comment, especially as a browser refresh or something similar can lead to one losing all that one has typed. All one needs to do is look at Nick Pelling's thread on Milanese ciphers to see page after page of comments by me with no intervening comments by anyone else. (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.) Maybe my approach of focusing on a small number of topics may seem myopic, but that is my preferred method. The reason I have devoted so much effort to cryptography in the early 15th century is not due to a perception of my theory being threatened on the cryptographic front, quite the opposite.

Clearly as Koen acknowledged before that there is no reason the Voynich could not date from the 1430s my theory is not under threat, if it ever was. The reason I have written about this more is simply, because I think it merits it.

This topic has piqued my interest.

(Antonio García Jiménez frequently has many comments in a row on his thread with no intervening comments from anyone else.)