Mark, I know you were confused when your motivations were questioned but this kind of flurry of posts all in a row is probably a reason why some (at least me) thought back in the other thread that you were approaching this issue through the lens of it posing a threat to your theory, rather than a more objective purpose of applying scrutiny to others' arguments. It doesn't often happen in this forum that someone posts seven times in a row to the same thread without any intervening comments from others, but this happened multiple times to similar degrees in the other thread.
Nothing wrong with approaching it through the lens of your own theory, as long as you are aware of that bias...
Nothing wrong with approaching it through the lens of your own theory, as long as you are aware of that bias...