Floating gallows
#12
(16-11-2022, 08:27 PM)Hermes777 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This representation of a 'benched' gallows - the glyph [t]? - is intriguing, for example. What might it tell us about the phenomenon of 'benching' and the integration of the gallows into the text?
[Image: attachment.php?aid=6984]
This split gallows structure seems most similar to one small but distinct group of words containing two gallows.
_
Along with the various insertions of single gallows into [cheey] I listed earlier, there's also one token of [cTheety].  That could just be a one-off anomaly.  The insertion of two gallows seems to become more common, though, when a similarly-formed word contains two [ch] benches in it.
_
So, for example, we have:
[chechy] 1
*[kchechy] 0, but [kchekchy] 1
*[cKhechy] 0, but [cKhecKhy] 1
*[chkechy] 0 and *[chtechy] 0
[chekchy] 2 and [chetchy] 4
[checKhy] 46 and [checThy] 26
_
[chochy] 5
*[kchochy] 0, but [kchokchy] 2 (one has a comma break: [kcho,kchy]); [tchotchy] 1
[cKhochy] 1 and [cKhocKhy] 1; [cThochy] 1
*[chkochy] 0 and *[chtochy] 0
[chokchy] 14 and [chotchy] 11
[chocKhy] 17 and [chocThy] 18
_
Along with [tchotchy], there's also one token of [tchotchey] (the gallows-less [chochey] doesn't occur, but [chotchey], [chocThey], and so forth do).
_
So with the "base" forms [chechy], [chochy], and [chochey], it seems as though a gallows at the beginning, inserted either as [tch]/[kch] or [cTh]/[cKh], tends surprisingly often to be combined with a second gallows positioned the same way relative to the second [ch] bench.
_
The non-gallows part of the split-gallows structure shown above seem to read [cho.chey], with a space -- a sequence that, like [chochey] all run together, never occurs as such by itself.  Despite the space, the split gallows suggests the two "halves" also somehow form a single unit, which makes me suspect the whole structure represents another word in the [chochey] group.
_
So as [kchekchy] is to [cKhecKhy]
and [kchokchy] is to [cKhocKhy],
maybe [tchotchey] is to what we're seeing here -- equivalent to [cThocThey]?
_
(Sorry about the strange formatting; for some reason, my paragraph breaks in this post weren't "taking" as usual.)
[+] 2 users say Thank You to pfeaster for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Floating gallows - by nablator - 16-11-2022, 12:01 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by ReneZ - 16-11-2022, 01:34 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by pfeaster - 16-11-2022, 03:09 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by MarcoP - 16-11-2022, 04:44 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by nablator - 16-11-2022, 05:07 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by MichelleL11 - 16-11-2022, 05:55 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by RenegadeHealer - 17-11-2022, 12:44 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by nablator - 17-11-2022, 01:30 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by obelus - 27-11-2022, 10:44 AM
RE: Floating gallows - by Emma May Smith - 16-11-2022, 04:46 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by pfeaster - 16-11-2022, 07:48 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by Emma May Smith - 16-11-2022, 08:52 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by pfeaster - 17-11-2022, 04:47 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by Hermes777 - 16-11-2022, 08:27 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by pfeaster - 17-11-2022, 03:25 AM
RE: Floating gallows - by RenegadeHealer - 17-11-2022, 02:57 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by nablator - 17-11-2022, 03:04 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by RenegadeHealer - 17-11-2022, 05:53 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by pfeaster - 17-11-2022, 05:54 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by ReneZ - 16-11-2022, 11:21 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by Koen G - 17-11-2022, 05:19 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by nablator - 18-11-2022, 02:35 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by Scarecrow - 19-11-2022, 05:00 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by nablator - 19-11-2022, 08:12 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by nablator - 21-11-2022, 10:38 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by pfeaster - 20-11-2022, 02:48 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by tavie - 19-11-2022, 06:43 PM
RE: Floating gallows - by ReneZ - 20-11-2022, 01:06 AM
RE: Floating gallows - by MarcoP - 27-11-2022, 05:41 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)