01-09-2016, 12:08 PM
Just some random comments:
- When I looked, I missed Salomon's reading of the last part, but his reading is the same as the one quoted by Panofsky. Panofsky is almost certainly quoting Salomon, though his (telegram-style) answers to the questions do not say so.
- One should probably not say that these lines are commonly accepted to be a later addition. We simply don't know either way
- There are some more readings. I believe there was one that was presented in the D'Imperio / Currier conference
- Generally speaking, readings from people without any experience in palaeography should robably not receive too much attention. This is not easy to implement since often we just don't know whether they have or not