(31-10-2022, 09:10 PM)Mark Knowles wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There should be an option for ciphers that are more advanced than mono- or poly-alphabetic substitution: they are in a completely different class and some of them might even be possible: with homophones, nulls or vord-segmentation (in 3 parts or more). Then there are codes and algorithms (not necessarily as difficult to use as a mathematical algorithm or cumbersome as cipher wheels or a code book). My own favorite anti-polybius is difficult to categorize: it is an algorithm but it can work as a simple substitution for one-letter vords and also as a code generator.(31-10-2022, 09:07 PM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Cipher is maybe too restrictive, I took it in the more general meaning of any type of encryption.Can you elaborate what you mean by that? What in your opinion do you think the options should have been?
| Poll: What in your opinion is the most likely explanation for the nature of the Voynich text? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| It is written in a known or unknown natural language in an unknown script | 2 | 7.14% | |
| It is written in a cipher | 17 | 60.71% | |
| It is meaningless text | 1 | 3.57% | |
| It is written in some system of shorthand | 7 | 25.00% | |
| It is written in an invented language | 1 | 3.57% | |
| Other - please specify | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 28 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
[Poll for Mark Knowles] Explanation for Voynich text?
|
|
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Mark Knowles' theories of pharma and other labels | Mark Knowles | 96 | 78,477 |
10-04-2020, 07:42 PM Last Post: ReneZ |
|
Users browsing this thread:

