@Aga
I think this was discussed somewhere else, unfortunately I don't remember the exact argument. Out of my head I can only immediately suggest that the hand is not the same as in the other extraneous writings added by the VMS scribe(s). Means some later person, perhaps the next owner.
What I'm puzzled at, is that March through September names are generally consistent with the "Germanic" line (say, an Allemannic dialect), while October through December names end with "re" instead of "er", which I think would be typical for Romance languages instead. In another thread I suggested that some months may have been added by one person, and some - by another. But the case when that could come to reality is not trivial - like, e.g. two different persons possessing two different quires and suddenly deciding to add month names independently of each other.
@pedestrian
I now see your point. Initially I was focused on Allemannic month names and therefore not interested in the later section written by another scribe. Indeed, that's an interesting idea of yours worth a deeper look.
I think this was discussed somewhere else, unfortunately I don't remember the exact argument. Out of my head I can only immediately suggest that the hand is not the same as in the other extraneous writings added by the VMS scribe(s). Means some later person, perhaps the next owner.
What I'm puzzled at, is that March through September names are generally consistent with the "Germanic" line (say, an Allemannic dialect), while October through December names end with "re" instead of "er", which I think would be typical for Romance languages instead. In another thread I suggested that some months may have been added by one person, and some - by another. But the case when that could come to reality is not trivial - like, e.g. two different persons possessing two different quires and suddenly deciding to add month names independently of each other.
@pedestrian
I now see your point. Initially I was focused on Allemannic month names and therefore not interested in the later section written by another scribe. Indeed, that's an interesting idea of yours worth a deeper look.