21-05-2022, 06:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 21-05-2022, 06:36 PM by RobGea.
Edit Reason: Added link
)
I havent drawn any conclusions 'cos ive now got a headache 
So feel free to post any observations , conclusions, ideas and whatnot.
What could be done better:
use high ascii codes instead of notation so then any '@<chr>' or '<chr>@' bigrams would probably have slighly different counts.
Make an 'expected differences' column, i was going to and forgot
This experiment was derived from Juan_Salis' suggestion You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Also, related work is 'Glyph combinations across word breaks in the Voynich Manuscript' but to my shame i can't remember the details in it
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
So feel free to post any observations , conclusions, ideas and whatnot.
What could be done better:
use high ascii codes instead of notation so then any '@<chr>' or '<chr>@' bigrams would probably have slighly different counts.
Make an 'expected differences' column, i was going to and forgot
This experiment was derived from Juan_Salis' suggestion You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Also, related work is 'Glyph combinations across word breaks in the Voynich Manuscript' but to my shame i can't remember the details in it
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.