19-08-2016, 08:38 PM
Rockets to the moon, I say. But how? Nick has a ten-year-old theory. I'm sure it's a good theory, but if it was something that could be put into practice, why hasn't that happened? And many of us have tried to match images in the VMs with those in various medieval manuscripts. It makes for interesting discussions, but there are certain problems, as Diane has pointed out.
The problems include subjective interpretation and the use of one-to-one correspondence. What to do? Institute a paradigm shift. Instead of following any sort of one-to-one correspondence, *require* a two-to-two correspondence. A pair in the real world that corresponds to a pair in the VMs. This will not eliminate subjective interpretation, but it significantly reduces the number of options, after which other specific criteria can be applied.
It works like this. Suppose we have a stadium full of people and we ask a question. Will everyone who is not a twin please leave? And everyone complies with the protocol. The number of those remaining will be greatly reduced. It also works in the VMs. Anyone can recognize VMs Pisces as a pair of fish. And rather than being a clever paradigm that is too complex to implement, the pairing paradigm is so simple and obvious at the beginning that it basically fails to register among those investigators who seem to feel that this complex problem requires complex solutions.
Make the paradigm shift. Institute the pairing paradigm. Follow where it leads: example after example after example. All concentrated in the first five houses of the VMs Zodiac. Then look back and ask how it is that this pathway exists in the VMs? Perhaps a better understanding can be gained by following a simple path that the Vms author provides.
The problems include subjective interpretation and the use of one-to-one correspondence. What to do? Institute a paradigm shift. Instead of following any sort of one-to-one correspondence, *require* a two-to-two correspondence. A pair in the real world that corresponds to a pair in the VMs. This will not eliminate subjective interpretation, but it significantly reduces the number of options, after which other specific criteria can be applied.
It works like this. Suppose we have a stadium full of people and we ask a question. Will everyone who is not a twin please leave? And everyone complies with the protocol. The number of those remaining will be greatly reduced. It also works in the VMs. Anyone can recognize VMs Pisces as a pair of fish. And rather than being a clever paradigm that is too complex to implement, the pairing paradigm is so simple and obvious at the beginning that it basically fails to register among those investigators who seem to feel that this complex problem requires complex solutions.
Make the paradigm shift. Institute the pairing paradigm. Follow where it leads: example after example after example. All concentrated in the first five houses of the VMs Zodiac. Then look back and ask how it is that this pathway exists in the VMs? Perhaps a better understanding can be gained by following a simple path that the Vms author provides.