08-12-2021, 09:15 PM
Well, there you have it! A phonetic interpretation of the EVA transcription, into plain English, none the less. Or some other language, if you like. Easier than falling off a log. Surely that represents an example of something.
I think we can agree that the proposed choice of language is going to be in the investigator's area of familiarity: Armenian, Aramaic, Aleut, etc. Attacking from the side of language choice at least appears to be a problematic approach.
An alternative approach would be the glyph to phoneme conversion. Perhaps it should be noted, first of all, that anyone who has accepted the phonetic interpretations implied by the EVA transcription, has immersed themselves in quicksand. This is a flawed analogy, as I understand the origins of EVA. There is *no implied* phonetic component in the EVA symbols.
Other than the vague suggestion that a determination of phonetic values might be tied in with the so-called '4 x 17' symbol sequence of f57v, there hasn't been much discussion of finding a method to attach phonetic values to VMs glyphs. Establishment of a correct conversion would surely be significant.
Perhaps all 'language first' solutions can be characterized and classified as false. It seems to hold up so far. If someone has a proposed solution, pick a random page from the VMs botany section and see how that goes. There is little reason to argue the methodology. Have the investigator demonstrate the methodology within the VMs.
I think we can agree that the proposed choice of language is going to be in the investigator's area of familiarity: Armenian, Aramaic, Aleut, etc. Attacking from the side of language choice at least appears to be a problematic approach.
An alternative approach would be the glyph to phoneme conversion. Perhaps it should be noted, first of all, that anyone who has accepted the phonetic interpretations implied by the EVA transcription, has immersed themselves in quicksand. This is a flawed analogy, as I understand the origins of EVA. There is *no implied* phonetic component in the EVA symbols.
Other than the vague suggestion that a determination of phonetic values might be tied in with the so-called '4 x 17' symbol sequence of f57v, there hasn't been much discussion of finding a method to attach phonetic values to VMs glyphs. Establishment of a correct conversion would surely be significant.
Perhaps all 'language first' solutions can be characterized and classified as false. It seems to hold up so far. If someone has a proposed solution, pick a random page from the VMs botany section and see how that goes. There is little reason to argue the methodology. Have the investigator demonstrate the methodology within the VMs.