I don't see the language choice as being all that relevant. The process of reading, in other words, the methodology is what seems important to me. There is also the question of whether Voychinese is a natural language. Or is it something else: encoded, encrypted, gibberish, hoax or whatever? Something other or more than a version of natural language.
What are the steps in the investigator's methodology? In the process of reading, glyphs represent phonemes, and phonemes combine to make words, of a given language. How does the proposed interpretive product attach itself to this process? Is EVA - o really a phonetic "o" or is it something else? <Trickery has already been demonstrated.> Which comes first, the glyphs or the language?
The whole idea of Newbold's microscopic "edge phenomenon" is a total hoax. The was no mechanism by which that could be accomplished - at that scale. Any edge phenomenon that might be present would be due to the differential movement of ink on a fibrous surface. Depending on magnification, irregularities will be found because the surface is irregular. At least Newbold's cosmic interpretation served to support WMV's Roger Bacon hypothesis, but this too has been shown to be highly irregular.
What are the steps in the investigator's methodology? In the process of reading, glyphs represent phonemes, and phonemes combine to make words, of a given language. How does the proposed interpretive product attach itself to this process? Is EVA - o really a phonetic "o" or is it something else? <Trickery has already been demonstrated.> Which comes first, the glyphs or the language?
The whole idea of Newbold's microscopic "edge phenomenon" is a total hoax. The was no mechanism by which that could be accomplished - at that scale. Any edge phenomenon that might be present would be due to the differential movement of ink on a fibrous surface. Depending on magnification, irregularities will be found because the surface is irregular. At least Newbold's cosmic interpretation served to support WMV's Roger Bacon hypothesis, but this too has been shown to be highly irregular.