Glyph counts between Gallows

[julian]

For Voyn_101 the number will be N for benched and M for un-benched. Will M-N be different or the same for all transcriptions, and will the shapes of the distributions look the same as for EVA?

Yeah, that's basically what I mean. I don't know how easy or time consuming it is for you to repeat the experiment with a different text file? If it's not too much trouble, there is something you could do to remove my worries   And I think the result may be interesting either way.

Just make a copy of the EVA file you used and turn a number of n-grams into single characters with find and replace. Since we are only looking at counts, this may even be the same character, like "b".

[ch] -> find and replace with b
[sh] -> b
[ain] -> b
[aiin] -> b
[qo] -> b

Like this, you will have replaced the most annoying n-grams with a single character. If this only changes the absolute values but nothing else, parsing is likely not an issue.

Hi Koen, here are the results without/with your substitutions:

Un-benched pure EVA:

Un-benched modified EVA:


Benched, pure EVA:

Benched, mod EVA:



In summary, the modes change as follows:

p goes from 7 -> 5
f goes from 6 -> 4
k goes from 5 -> 4
t goes from 5 -> 4

cph 3 -> 2
cfh 3 -> 3
ckh 3 -> 2
cth 3 -> 2