31-07-2021, 05:58 PM
(31-07-2021, 01:01 PM)MarcoP wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(31-07-2021, 11:53 AM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.julian wrote:Another goal was to see whether there are differences in the distributions of number of glyphs following EVA p, k, f and t. It turns out that statistically there is a difference: EVA t , k tend to be followed by 5 glyphs before the next gallows is written, and EVA f, p tend to be followed by 6 or 7 glyphs.
That's probably because words are longer (or p/f are inserted) on the first lines of paragraphs.
It seems to me that p/f words are longer because they include a bench much more often that k/t words. If benches are represented as single characters (e.g. C and S) instead of two characters (ch and sh), the next-gallows-distance has a maximum at 5 characters for all gallows.
EDIT: if these figures are correct, they confirm Koen's idea about the impact of parsing.
It may be that using Voyn_101 would be clearer for this study, as GC defined separate codes for the benched and un-benched gallows.