|
Time to retire Currier languages?
|
 Member details
Posts: 717 Threads: 41 Thanks Received: 504 in 288 posts Thanks Given: 208 Joined: Jan 2016 Reputation: 3
27-07-2021, 04:51 PM
The folios of the manuscript are known to have been shuffled out of their original order. I don't see how the order of sections or scribes can be used as an argument unless the original order can be fully reconstructed.
Has anybody done that? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Independent Analysis Identifying Languages Beyond Currier A/ B, compared to René Zand | npcompl33t | 18 | 2,667 |
12-10-2026, 04:10 PM Last Post: npcompl33t |
|
| "The Currier languages revisited" revisited | kckluge | 72 | 28,687 |
19-02-2026, 02:11 PM Last Post: kckluge |
|
| Extension to the Currier languages | ReneZ | 19 | 16,324 |
15-05-2024, 10:02 PM Last Post: Juan_Sali |
|
| Do f58r/f58v show Currier languages evolving? | nickpelling | 14 | 14,522 |
29-12-2022, 01:26 PM Last Post: Aga Tentakulus |
|
| Implications of the continuity of Currier "languages" | MarcoP | 21 | 27,625 |
31-12-2018, 05:13 PM Last Post: nickpelling |
|
| Scribal hands and Currier languages | Koen G | 15 | 19,158 |
16-02-2017, 10:33 AM Last Post: -JKP- |
|
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)