16-05-2021, 07:38 PM
(16-05-2021, 07:14 PM)DONJCH wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.but it still surprises me that the calibrated results end up with higher precision
It's not with higher precision (if we speak of individual folio results). Basically what they do they take the one-sigma interval of the uncalibrated distribution and, mapping it against the calibration curve, show what's the respective calibrated interval would be. Next, they take the two-sigma interval of the uncalibrated PDF, and, mapping it against the calibration curve, show what's the respective calibrated interval would be.
The uncalibrated PDF (and hence its parameters such as mean and sigma) has its own precision, which is determined by the precision of the experimental measurement, I'm not exactly sure which it is, but the worst figure mentioned in the report in this respect is 0,6%, which looks quite satisfactory, I guess.