mscheo, your chart is pretty close to how I perceive the shape combinations. I see them that way partly because it follows Latin scribal conventions that were used to write numerous languages.
These are common ligatures and abbreviations used in medieval scribal conventions:
y m g r s n k u b
For example, in Latin conventions, m = r + (is/es abbreviation)
k = i + (is/es abbreviation, which is sometimes intepreted as "-em" or as "-tem" if it is "Item")
s = c + macron (written as a connected tail)
r = (i or r) + macron (written as a connected tail)
In other words, VMS glyph shapes are very similar to Latin building blocks used in ligatures and abbreviations.
But, I am (of course) not certain that the combinations are interpreted (parsed out) the same way they are in medieval conventions. What is two VMS shapes combined might represent several characters in a western language, but possibly one character in Voynichese. It's even possible that three or four basic shapes represent one character (or vice versa).
These are common ligatures and abbreviations used in medieval scribal conventions:
y m g r s n k u b
For example, in Latin conventions, m = r + (is/es abbreviation)
k = i + (is/es abbreviation, which is sometimes intepreted as "-em" or as "-tem" if it is "Item")
s = c + macron (written as a connected tail)
r = (i or r) + macron (written as a connected tail)
In other words, VMS glyph shapes are very similar to Latin building blocks used in ligatures and abbreviations.
But, I am (of course) not certain that the combinations are interpreted (parsed out) the same way they are in medieval conventions. What is two VMS shapes combined might represent several characters in a western language, but possibly one character in Voynichese. It's even possible that three or four basic shapes represent one character (or vice versa).


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)