The return of the "Voynich faked it" theory

[ReneZ]

(quoting the blog of Klaus Schmeh: )
Last but not least, the fact that the contents of the manuscript are as meaningless as possible speaks for a forgery from the early 20th century.

A fine example of a non-sequitur.

The conclusion in no way follows from the observation.
Whether it is meaningful or not, and whether it is genuine or not, are two independent and unrelated questions.

Fakes exist. Specifically, fakes of old manuscripts exist.
In all cases these are meaningful documents.
That is a simple but sufficient proof of the non-sequitur.