02-06-2016, 02:36 AM
If my proposed deconstruction ideas do, indeed, account for a way to understand how a large group of the VMS words were constructed, ii would seem the following statements about the Voynich Manuscript are true.
The Voynich Manuscript glyph words are made up of parts - coded parts - of some kind and for some purpose..
One of the groups of coded parts (Group I) is present in all VMS words.
Only a single Group I code is found in any VMS word, as is also the case with the other code groups (Groups II - VI), if they are present at all.
There seems to be a consistent order and system that can be used to separate the codes in each word, in a logical way, to deconstruct the words.
There are a few words in the VMS (12 of the 2,000+ words found twice or more) which do not fit the deconstruction scheme, groups and sequence or operations, at all. I am ignorant of why they were not originally constructed by the author to fit.
There seem to be one of several different and distinct series of code groups contained in most of the shorter VMS words.
The one-glyph words contain only a Group I code.
The two-glyph words contain a Group I code plus either a Group V or Group VI code, as in:
Group I code, Group V code, or
Group I code, Group VI code.
The three-glyph words are usually constructed of:
Group I code, Group IV code, Group V code, or
Group I code, Group IV code, Group VI code, or
Group I code, Group V code, Group VI code.
VMS words made up of four or more glyphs all contain a Group I code and a Group V and/or Group VI code as part of their construction.
Yes, there are also other code groups represented in the other VMS words - this is about the most common groups of deconstruction code groupings.
Since it seems to show an almost universal pattern, the proposed deconstruction method, codes and sequence must be accounted for in any proposed meaning for the words in the Voynich Manuscript. I don't think the proposed solution works so widely by accident nor can it be excluded from consideration in finding any ultimate meaning of the words.
This proposed solution would also explain why the EVA = q glyph is only found on the left side of VMS words - it's only found in Group I codes.
Thank you.
Don of Tallahassee
The Voynich Manuscript glyph words are made up of parts - coded parts - of some kind and for some purpose..
One of the groups of coded parts (Group I) is present in all VMS words.
Only a single Group I code is found in any VMS word, as is also the case with the other code groups (Groups II - VI), if they are present at all.
There seems to be a consistent order and system that can be used to separate the codes in each word, in a logical way, to deconstruct the words.
There are a few words in the VMS (12 of the 2,000+ words found twice or more) which do not fit the deconstruction scheme, groups and sequence or operations, at all. I am ignorant of why they were not originally constructed by the author to fit.
There seem to be one of several different and distinct series of code groups contained in most of the shorter VMS words.
The one-glyph words contain only a Group I code.
The two-glyph words contain a Group I code plus either a Group V or Group VI code, as in:
Group I code, Group V code, or
Group I code, Group VI code.
The three-glyph words are usually constructed of:
Group I code, Group IV code, Group V code, or
Group I code, Group IV code, Group VI code, or
Group I code, Group V code, Group VI code.
VMS words made up of four or more glyphs all contain a Group I code and a Group V and/or Group VI code as part of their construction.
Yes, there are also other code groups represented in the other VMS words - this is about the most common groups of deconstruction code groupings.
Since it seems to show an almost universal pattern, the proposed deconstruction method, codes and sequence must be accounted for in any proposed meaning for the words in the Voynich Manuscript. I don't think the proposed solution works so widely by accident nor can it be excluded from consideration in finding any ultimate meaning of the words.
This proposed solution would also explain why the EVA = q glyph is only found on the left side of VMS words - it's only found in Group I codes.
Thank you.
Don of Tallahassee