25-05-2016, 01:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 25-05-2016, 01:58 PM by don of tallahassee.)
Hello,
I take this opportunity to reveal my latest work on deconstructing the Voynich Manuscript text words and label words.
It shows the results when my proposed system, code group tables and sequence are used for deconstructing the more than 2,000 words that appear twice or more in the VMS.
12 of the repeated VMS words do not deconstruct as I envision and show.
The results are at:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Notice that many of the individual codes in Groups II through V! are often either the only representative(s) of those code.glyph(s) to be found in any of those groups, or, if duplicates or triplicates, often separated by one or more intervening groups (thus making them easier to identify). On close examination, the groups should be found to be very different from one another. Slightly more than a total of 400 codes are used to deconstruct the 2,000+ words.
The duplicates and triplicates were what made me have to figure out the sequence of deconstruction - without a consistent deconstruction sequence, duplicated codes in VMS words might be arbitrarily assigned (by the person doing the deconstruction) to the wrong group.
I think many of the remaining single-appearance words can also be deconstructed using the same system, code group tables and sequence.
Please also notice that no glyphs are added, changed, left out, moved, or exchanged for other glyphs - such changes seem to be unnecessary.
I encourage others to offer any reasoning they may be able to think of as to why almost all of the repeated VMS words seem to deconstruct in this manner. Or to check my work and results.
Thank you.
Don of Tallahassee
I take this opportunity to reveal my latest work on deconstructing the Voynich Manuscript text words and label words.
It shows the results when my proposed system, code group tables and sequence are used for deconstructing the more than 2,000 words that appear twice or more in the VMS.
12 of the repeated VMS words do not deconstruct as I envision and show.
The results are at:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Notice that many of the individual codes in Groups II through V! are often either the only representative(s) of those code.glyph(s) to be found in any of those groups, or, if duplicates or triplicates, often separated by one or more intervening groups (thus making them easier to identify). On close examination, the groups should be found to be very different from one another. Slightly more than a total of 400 codes are used to deconstruct the 2,000+ words.
The duplicates and triplicates were what made me have to figure out the sequence of deconstruction - without a consistent deconstruction sequence, duplicated codes in VMS words might be arbitrarily assigned (by the person doing the deconstruction) to the wrong group.
I think many of the remaining single-appearance words can also be deconstructed using the same system, code group tables and sequence.
Please also notice that no glyphs are added, changed, left out, moved, or exchanged for other glyphs - such changes seem to be unnecessary.
I encourage others to offer any reasoning they may be able to think of as to why almost all of the repeated VMS words seem to deconstruct in this manner. Or to check my work and results.
Thank you.
Don of Tallahassee