ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT.

[Wladimir D]

When I found example 2, I thought it was fixing eva-s to g. But when I found more examples 1 and 3, I began to doubt. Are these not separate ligatures, differing in the way they attach the parenthesis to the s and r characters.
The parenthesis (168 v101 code) is often written separately with the e (6) character, but the transcription defines these 2 characters as “y”. The parenthesis also occurs independently, without eva-e (5, 15), as well as on the 2nd floor (11). (in my previous post I pointed out that many symbols are found on the second floor)
In example 7, the parenthesis is attached to the full eva-o.
Example 10 should be transcribed ") Khey".
There are combinations with a horizontal bar (8, 9) and a dot (13).
Let us consider separately example 4. It is not written eva-y + apostrophe here. This is eva-b + “)”. “Apostrophe” in eva-b is written from bottom to top, so if y + apostrophe were written, then the beginning of the apostrophe (yellow arrow) should be written in dark ink from a parenthesis. In this regard, I have a comment on the display of code 191 v101 - the apostrophe is raised too high (I did not meet it in this form, maybe I missed it? (If this is not an example with 18v, where there is a large gap - 140 eva)).
Example 14 has a double parenthesis.
In example 12, the bracket is added to the bench, similar to how eva-e is added to the bench with a gap.
The whole set of examples suggests that the parenthesis symbol is an independent glyph in all spellings?