Classical astrology in the text of the Voynich zodiac?

[Anton]

Regarding the title post by Marco, I would suggest that for such kind of contextual analysis to be systematic, the following should be checked.

Let's say we have two sets of objects (A and B) and a set of contextually homogenous folios further subdivided into two folio subsets (I and II). Now, therefore:

1) Are the matches A to I and B to II unanimous? In other words, do objects of the  A set not appear in the folio subset II, neither B in subset I?
2) Do matches decribed in item 1) above appear consistently in all folios across subsets? Or there are any folios where the respective objects are absent?
3) Are there any other objects beside those belonging to sets A and B that would exhibit similar behaviour in regard to folio subsets I and II?
4) Do objects of the  A and B sets appear consistently in the same sub-context within a folio (e.g. in the same place of the folio, near similar objects in folios etc.)
5) Are object sets A and B really "sets" (i.e. are they homogenous in themselves), or they are rather artificial constructs by the subjective observer?