Quote:And the close arrangement of these folios...
i guess you mean all the ones with rainbows? Or are you including the oak and the ivy and other images?
But i don't think the pages are in the correct order as they are bound. Or do you mean that is part of why they are not bound in order, that the current rebinding contains clues in itself? everything that seems like random chaos is purposeful and included in the unfolding? All coincidences planned?
i understand you to mean that the absence of a figure in a double rainbow setting on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is meant to imply same. ie, you are to be aware of the religious double rainbow portraits, see the similarity, note the absence, and derive some sort of meaning from that?
I don't understand how the sacred bleeding host links figure into what you are saying. there is only one colourless example of a rainbow? And all the ones not on a rainbow, what is that supposed to indicate? That in fact the rainbow images are not that frequent? I also don't understand pulling in the oak and the ivy or how they are discordant or why that helps them fit in.
I would be open to the idea of well known imagery being used as some sort of code but i don't see how it all comes together.
Is it a possibility that they are not rainbows at all, were never meant to be indicative of absent religious icons, and have a completely different meaning altogether?