The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake?
#13
OK, without being rude, ReneZ here develops theories based upon the physical evidence he has seen and handled.
Everything else in this thread is a hypothesis that is based the posters opinion of third party evidence.
Let's stick to concrete evidence people, instead of building castles in the air.
Thread locked before it become contentious.


Messages In This Thread
The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by proto57 - 30-03-2020, 05:47 PM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by ReneZ - 30-03-2020, 07:33 PM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by ReneZ - 31-03-2020, 09:45 AM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by proto57 - 02-04-2020, 07:39 PM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by proto57 - 02-04-2020, 07:42 PM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by ReneZ - 02-04-2020, 08:09 PM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by proto57 - 02-04-2020, 09:57 PM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by ReneZ - 03-04-2020, 11:02 AM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by -JKP- - 03-04-2020, 11:56 AM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by ReneZ - 04-04-2020, 07:27 AM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by -JKP- - 04-04-2020, 07:59 AM
RE: The 1665/6 Marci Letter: A fake? - by davidjackson - 04-04-2020, 11:37 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  1665/66 Marci Discussion: Locked? proto57 15 18,859 12-05-2020, 05:16 PM
Last Post: proto57

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: