(19-02-2020, 03:05 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(17-02-2020, 10:57 PM)Torsten wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view."The analysis was made on a widely available transliteration of the Voynich manuscript text, the '101' format by Glen Claston" (Alin 2019, p. 5).That's the first time I've seen this statement by Nick and I have to say it is BANG on the money. It deserves to be a sig file.
"I strongly believe that the biggest problem we face precedes cryptanalysis – in short, we can’t yet parse what we’re seeing well enough to run genuinely useful statistical tests" (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.).
Even now, years later, we have NOT yet parsed the glyphs in any way that is empirically substantiated and until at least SOME of that is accomplished, a large proportion of statistical tests will be glyph-assumption-based and highly questionable.
Only space detection and the choice of glyph variants (how many are there?) influence the words network statistics. 8am is as good as daiin for that purpose.