I think that any summary of current Voynich research should mention Rene's work, while only his web-site is linked. Apart from this, the article looks like a good introduction to the hobby.
I approve the focus on peer-reviewed publications: as the article says, the Cheshire incident tells us that one cannot blindly trust peer-review, but the formal process of publishing a paper helps making it more informative.
It is great to see that Lisa Fagin Davis is mentioned as a paladin of good research, as well as that Timm and Schinner's work is receiving the attention it deserves.
I haven't read Alin's paper yet and I think I never read Amancio et al. 2013 - though I don't think I have the skills to completely understand all details, I hope I will find the time to look into both works.
I approve the focus on peer-reviewed publications: as the article says, the Cheshire incident tells us that one cannot blindly trust peer-review, but the formal process of publishing a paper helps making it more informative.
It is great to see that Lisa Fagin Davis is mentioned as a paladin of good research, as well as that Timm and Schinner's work is receiving the attention it deserves.
I haven't read Alin's paper yet and I think I never read Amancio et al. 2013 - though I don't think I have the skills to completely understand all details, I hope I will find the time to look into both works.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)