25-01-2020, 01:15 PM
If we keep in mind that you can date Medieval mss. with some confidencee only within let's say 50 years I would like to add two more datings:
In the 17r marginalia the script (and the style of the illustration?) look like (contemporary to) 116v
The quire markings look very much second half of the 15th c. and I think rather nearer middle of the c. and the foliation could be late, maybe even 17th c. (Prague)
And I think one could build a timeline in the development of the illustrations and the script, whicch would mean there is likely one person responsible for the ms. and we don't need a bunch of hands and scribes and illustrators.
In the 17r marginalia the script (and the style of the illustration?) look like (contemporary to) 116v
The quire markings look very much second half of the 15th c. and I think rather nearer middle of the c. and the foliation could be late, maybe even 17th c. (Prague)
And I think one could build a timeline in the development of the illustrations and the script, whicch would mean there is likely one person responsible for the ms. and we don't need a bunch of hands and scribes and illustrators.

