sh_ and ch_ compose the same words

[Torsten]

You obviously didn't understand my comment (see stats.stackexchange.com).

I am afraid that you don't have the slightest idea what I understand or don't understand.
I prefer a more constructive way of discussing.

Please excuse my hasty words, I did not want to sound that mean.

My point is that I find it hard to interpret the outcome of the Pearson Correlation test for percent values. For instance the correlation coefficient for the percentage values for Quire13 and 20 is +0.71 whereas the result for the token frequencies is +0.58. But what does the value of +0.71 mean? The value is even higher as the value for Quire 13 alone.

Pearson's Correlation(percent(chedy[400]@Quire13+20), percent(shedy[360]@Quire13+20)): +0.71  (n= 43 folios,p=4.23E-05)
Pearson's Correlation(chedy[400]@Quire13+20, shedy[360]@Quire13+20): +0.58  (n= 43 folios,p=4.23E-05)

Pearson's Correlation(percent(chedy[210]@Quire13), percent(shedy[247]@Quire13)): +0.68  (n= 20 folios)
Pearson's Correlation(chedy[210]@Quire13, shedy[247]@Quire13): +0.76 (n=20 folios)

Pearson's Correlation(percent(chedy[190]@Quire20), percent(shedy[113]@Quire20)): +0.12  (n=23 folios)
Pearson's Correlation(chedy[190]@Quire20, shedy[113]@Quire20): +0.3  (n=23 folios)