Mad Voynich theory #15,403 (and counting)

[Anton]

This theory suffers the same - I would not say weakness, - but peculiarity as any hoax theory. Namely, it has either to admit that the hoax is carefully developed to be strangely organized on purpose, or to explain how those strange properties may be normal from the stochastic perspective.

Like e.g. (taken from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.):

1) 49% of first vords of all paragraphs of botanical folios are unique.

2) As already indicated in the title post, 66% of first vords of first paragraphs (or, which is the same thing, first vords of folios) of botanical folios are unique.

3) 31% of first vords of non-first (second, third etc.) paragraphs of botanical folios are unique.

So, in botanical folios, first words of first paragraphs are twice "more unique" (sorry!) than first words of non-first paragraphs. Is that OK for a filler?