06-08-2019, 08:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2019, 08:52 PM by Mark Knowles.)
bi3mw:
Isn't it natural that labels should consist of a lot of unique words (if they make sense) ? Of course, the author(s) could have "simulated" this property, but I think that's unlikely.
--------
If you are interested you can read what I have written on Nick's blog on this subject. Suffice it to say I believe that some labels are nulls or null words, as I term them, and others are real genuine non-null words. I have guessed the number of 60% null labels and therefore 40% non-null labels, but this is really to give an idea of the order of magnitude of the number of null labels. I have suggested that one could possibly generalise this to Voynichese as a whole. I will be writing up my discoveries in full when I have time.
Isn't it natural that labels should consist of a lot of unique words (if they make sense) ? Of course, the author(s) could have "simulated" this property, but I think that's unlikely.
--------
If you are interested you can read what I have written on Nick's blog on this subject. Suffice it to say I believe that some labels are nulls or null words, as I term them, and others are real genuine non-null words. I have guessed the number of 60% null labels and therefore 40% non-null labels, but this is really to give an idea of the order of magnitude of the number of null labels. I have suggested that one could possibly generalise this to Voynichese as a whole. I will be writing up my discoveries in full when I have time.