What are the characteristics of Labelese?

[MarcoP]

One other interesting aspect of the Zodiac labels in my opinion is the fact that the words tend to be 'grouped' or clustered. Hard to explain precisly, but similar patterns tend to occur in a few adjacent zodiac signs.
Just to give an example, zodiac labels starting with the mildly unusual 'oeeo' and 'oeeeo' tend to be found in a few signs only. Mostly libra, I believe.

In 2015, Darren Worley discussed You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. a table of 360 angels associated with each of the zodiac degrees. The table has 30 rows for the degrees and 12 columns for the signs. The document linked by Darren is no more available, but the same table can be seen You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. Even if these are not "labels" (there are no associated images) they are names of personifications of individual zodiac degrees, and the Voynich star-nymphs appear to also play this role.

The table contains repeating names, that typically appear consecutively on a single row, i.e. for the same degree in consecutive zodiac signs. The rate of repetition appears to be higher than in Voynich zodiac labels, i.e. TTR is lower in the angelic table:
Angels: 285/360=0.791
VMS: 263/298=0.882

When consecutive names are not identical, they sometimes differ by one or two characters only: e.g.
Sachiel/Sachael
Athiel/Aphiel
Naphael/Naphadel
Zegiel/Zagiil
Tohiel/Tahoel
The two members of each pair belong to two adjacent zodiac signs.

I don't know how early this list of angels is: it is associated with a treaty known as "Ars Paulina", but the XV Century ms mentioned by Darren (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.) does not seem to include the table.
Overall, the table is similar to the first angelic language by Dee and Kelley (see You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.). It could well be that it dates to the same period.