You make a good point Anton. And my paper was, along with all the other Voynich submissions back then, rejected. I think there were as many as 5 submitted a couple of years ago.
But "never say never", because the committee is now open to the idea of having Voynich submissions. The "Exposition Track" to which they would be destined, has standards which allow they sort of hypotheses that really all Voynich talks would entail.
And anyway, if everyone gave up the first time, there would be no Moby Dick or Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. In fact, the year I was rejected by HistoCrypt, I decided to submit the talk to the NSA Cipher History Symposium, where it was accepted. So just the exercise of submitting was a valuable experience.
But of course I understand your reluctance. I don't have a dog in the fight, except to promote any chance of allowing people to understand the mysteries of the Voynich a bit better... and it would be great to see your ideas, there, if you change your mind.
But "never say never", because the committee is now open to the idea of having Voynich submissions. The "Exposition Track" to which they would be destined, has standards which allow they sort of hypotheses that really all Voynich talks would entail.
And anyway, if everyone gave up the first time, there would be no Moby Dick or Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. In fact, the year I was rejected by HistoCrypt, I decided to submit the talk to the NSA Cipher History Symposium, where it was accepted. So just the exercise of submitting was a valuable experience.
But of course I understand your reluctance. I don't have a dog in the fight, except to promote any chance of allowing people to understand the mysteries of the Voynich a bit better... and it would be great to see your ideas, there, if you change your mind.