16-03-2016, 03:21 PM
Thank you for your time!
At this moment i am (still) struggling through the PDF, but since the document is from 2014,
perhaps things and insights have been changed or improved on your side and i would like to ask you to explain if possible
and where I understood incorrectly let me know.
a* you wrote, that there are several possibilities for glyphs to originate, as part of another glyph, by adding vocal letters with others etc.
but did you examine how do glyph-groups originate in essence ?
If you look at the whole text, it must be possible to define "basic word stems". Did you look at such?
Otherwise I am willing to try that.
Note: for the programming I think it is best to leave out the labels and the very small words. I have such a transcription text if you need any.
b* the glyph groups are then changed. Are there exact rules for the change in those groups?
Then you define modifications. Change of a letter. Adding of a letter in the word. Adding of start-letter. Adding of a end-letter. Removal of a letter.
Did you write a program to analyse the exact changes on the stems, you can see the exact changes. If not, I am willing to give it a go.
Then the word-changes-count can be seen and we could see if there is a pattern. If there is a pattern we have the method and we see if we can make a device for that.
(You wrote ED=edit distance, but i prefer word-change-count) Anyway, i would like to see if there is a pattern.
c* You write there is a maximum on the change of a word-stem. That maximum seems 4.
Perhaps I missed this research, but did you write more on this?
d* The low frequency characters in a “glyp group” (which i call word i assume) seem to be always on or near the4 same page.
Did you run statistics on all (most common) groups on the whole text ? That would give a nice “page cluster versus glyp group” diagram,
Which can show that your assumption is right. That would mean that the page numbering is correct. Perhaps you can also see if there are pages “missing” based on the “missing glyp group changements”. Anyway most probable we must be able to see that some pages belong to each other, because the groups are clustered.
e* You made a graph with word-glyph repetitions compared with the 1 to 20- previous lines. Is that based on your own research on are you referring solely on the work of somebody else? Where is the data that you used for the VMS?
f* Further more, i do not understand why you choose to compare that with a poem. Do you have a program for these statistics, I would like to double check this entirely.
There are more detailed questions, but let’s start here.
At this moment i am (still) struggling through the PDF, but since the document is from 2014,
perhaps things and insights have been changed or improved on your side and i would like to ask you to explain if possible
and where I understood incorrectly let me know.
a* you wrote, that there are several possibilities for glyphs to originate, as part of another glyph, by adding vocal letters with others etc.
but did you examine how do glyph-groups originate in essence ?
If you look at the whole text, it must be possible to define "basic word stems". Did you look at such?
Otherwise I am willing to try that.
Note: for the programming I think it is best to leave out the labels and the very small words. I have such a transcription text if you need any.
b* the glyph groups are then changed. Are there exact rules for the change in those groups?
Then you define modifications. Change of a letter. Adding of a letter in the word. Adding of start-letter. Adding of a end-letter. Removal of a letter.
Did you write a program to analyse the exact changes on the stems, you can see the exact changes. If not, I am willing to give it a go.
Then the word-changes-count can be seen and we could see if there is a pattern. If there is a pattern we have the method and we see if we can make a device for that.
(You wrote ED=edit distance, but i prefer word-change-count) Anyway, i would like to see if there is a pattern.
c* You write there is a maximum on the change of a word-stem. That maximum seems 4.
Perhaps I missed this research, but did you write more on this?
d* The low frequency characters in a “glyp group” (which i call word i assume) seem to be always on or near the4 same page.
Did you run statistics on all (most common) groups on the whole text ? That would give a nice “page cluster versus glyp group” diagram,
Which can show that your assumption is right. That would mean that the page numbering is correct. Perhaps you can also see if there are pages “missing” based on the “missing glyp group changements”. Anyway most probable we must be able to see that some pages belong to each other, because the groups are clustered.
e* You made a graph with word-glyph repetitions compared with the 1 to 20- previous lines. Is that based on your own research on are you referring solely on the work of somebody else? Where is the data that you used for the VMS?
f* Further more, i do not understand why you choose to compare that with a poem. Do you have a program for these statistics, I would like to double check this entirely.
There are more detailed questions, but let’s start here.