Folio 114v is one of the clear cases where text was almost certainly not written in a line-by-line manner (at least for some parts), though the exact order of writing is still to be figured out.
JKP is absolutely right on this general topic, and this is something that can only be clear to people who have looked at the text very closely, e.g. while transcribing it.
However, the specific (and interesting) example of Wladimir does not really bear any signs of later additions.
The 'y' character in this word is represented as Eva code 189. I could not find it back in GC's transcription alphabet (v101).
JKP is absolutely right on this general topic, and this is something that can only be clear to people who have looked at the text very closely, e.g. while transcribing it.
However, the specific (and interesting) example of Wladimir does not really bear any signs of later additions.
The 'y' character in this word is represented as Eva code 189. I could not find it back in GC's transcription alphabet (v101).