03-12-2018, 10:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-12-2018, 10:18 AM by ChenZheChina.)
(03-12-2018, 08:05 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are still unanswered questions. The early mix-up between herbal A and herbal B folios happened before the gathering marks were added. This is because, for example, the 5th quire mark is on a B folio.
There are several different possible explanations for this.
Hi René,
I’m not sure about what do you mean by mix-up between Herbal A and Herbal B. For me, there are two understandings.
- Folios were split into piles. Some piles contain only Herbal A pages, while other piles contain only Herbal B pages. The binder did not know which piles are Herbal A or which piles are Herbal B, so they assigned gathering marks arbitrarily. The mix-up between Herbal A and Herbal B folios happened here, at quire-level. By doing so, gathering marks of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th, 15th and 17th are given to Herbal A piles, while gathering marks of 5th and 6th are given to Herbal B piles. Pages were re-ordered later, so there are quires mixing Herbal A and Herbal B pages.
- The pages were completely out-of-order. The binder knew nothing about page contents, so they decided to bind folios into quires arbitrarily. The mix-up between Herbal A and Herbal B folios happened here, at folio-level. By doing so, gathering marks of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th, 15th and 17th are given to Herbal A pages coincidentally, while gathering marks of 5th and 6th are given to Herbal B pages coincidentally.

