21-10-2018, 10:08 PM
No that explanation won't do.
The foliator is surely the same (why would it be another foliator for this specific folio?!), but the fact is that pagination is systematically in the margin. I inspected the first three quires to ascertain that, and with the exception of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. all page numbers are in the margin (although sometimes quite marginally). In the cases of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. they are not in the margin overall, but they are strictly in the margin in respect of the first paragraph - and asymmetry of the respective vellum sheets would explain these two cases away.
The foliator is surely the same (why would it be another foliator for this specific folio?!), but the fact is that pagination is systematically in the margin. I inspected the first three quires to ascertain that, and with the exception of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. all page numbers are in the margin (although sometimes quite marginally). In the cases of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. they are not in the margin overall, but they are strictly in the margin in respect of the first paragraph - and asymmetry of the respective vellum sheets would explain these two cases away.

