11-03-2016, 06:57 PM
In my opinion, another interesting parallel for Voynich You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is “Costanza” from ms You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., Augsburg?, 1520 – 1530.
This manuscript is one century later than the VMS, the artistic quality is different and this page clearly represents a different plant. Anyway, I think this is as boar-like a root as it gets.
This herbal is well known to those interested in the Voynich manuscript (it has been discussed by Nick Pelling You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.). It contains You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. Most of this repertoire seems to me to descend from the earlier alchemical herbals mentioned by Rene; I don't know if this manuscript is considered a late member of the family.
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=166]](http://www.voynich.ninja/attachment.php?aid=166)
This manuscript is one century later than the VMS, the artistic quality is different and this page clearly represents a different plant. Anyway, I think this is as boar-like a root as it gets.
This herbal is well known to those interested in the Voynich manuscript (it has been discussed by Nick Pelling You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.). It contains You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. Most of this repertoire seems to me to descend from the earlier alchemical herbals mentioned by Rene; I don't know if this manuscript is considered a late member of the family.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)