23-07-2018, 10:21 AM
Hello,
This is the most analytical thread ever about not being analytical!
I see the topic as a false dichotomy. Both conceptual and analytical thinking are needed. Analysis should suggest an explanation, a hypothesis or theory or at least a plausible paradigm that needs to be investigated further, by analyzing the consequences. This is how the scientific method works, usually, as a loop including both induction and deduction.
BTW has anyone done a study of the plausibility of "fused" or "hybrid" glyphs for g, m, u...?
This is the most analytical thread ever about not being analytical!
I see the topic as a false dichotomy. Both conceptual and analytical thinking are needed. Analysis should suggest an explanation, a hypothesis or theory or at least a plausible paradigm that needs to be investigated further, by analyzing the consequences. This is how the scientific method works, usually, as a loop including both induction and deduction.
BTW has anyone done a study of the plausibility of "fused" or "hybrid" glyphs for g, m, u...?
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)