22-07-2018, 04:37 PM
Maybe this was suggested before, but having read Torsten's study and Derek's study, I get the feeling that the only condition both maybe true is that the manuscript either -
1. Has a few proper nouns and facts and the rest is filled in with similar-looking glyphs that gives rise to the meaning-less word patterns of similar words near to each other. (Facts+Gibberish mixed)
2. Has no meaning at all
and someone just trolled the future..
3. Uses a way of encryption where many plaintext words correspond to similar encrypted words (Remember, Vogt proposed that the initial consonant was dropped while giving labels at times, and so this maybe occuring in the manuscript galore, and thus some different words come out as the same)
I'm thinking of using voynichese.com to try and see where all the label-words have been used in the rest of the text (those maybe the paragraphs with meaning), and maybe put those paragraphs together and look for sound-symbol relationships
1. Has a few proper nouns and facts and the rest is filled in with similar-looking glyphs that gives rise to the meaning-less word patterns of similar words near to each other. (Facts+Gibberish mixed)
2. Has no meaning at all
and someone just trolled the future..3. Uses a way of encryption where many plaintext words correspond to similar encrypted words (Remember, Vogt proposed that the initial consonant was dropped while giving labels at times, and so this maybe occuring in the manuscript galore, and thus some different words come out as the same)
I'm thinking of using voynichese.com to try and see where all the label-words have been used in the rest of the text (those maybe the paragraphs with meaning), and maybe put those paragraphs together and look for sound-symbol relationships