22-07-2018, 02:25 PM
(22-07-2018, 01:45 PM)Torsten wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(22-07-2018, 10:18 AM)Emma May Smith wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I remember You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. but couldn't come to a conclusion about them. Any thoughts?
The frequency of a word type is related to the frequency of similar word types.
I'm familiar with the idea. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. Though my You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. were that relationships between the frequencies of words was not the same across the whole text. There were multiple patterns of relationships which suggested that words behaved differently depending on the glyphs in those words.
As you yourself have noted, word beginning t and k tend to become more common when prefixed with o. However, while the further prefixing of q makes many words beginning qok more common again, word beginning qot become less common. Thus the actual content of words - the presence of t or k - is important. There could be several explanations for this, but it suggests that individual glyphs are meaningful because they influence the patterns in the text.

