Stop being analitical!

[farmerjohn]

I thought of translating according to his phonetic values,  but that lead to things like a four letter word having 72 possible results (6 each for the EVA a charachters, and 2 for EVA y) and then I stopped

Why? 72 possibilities is not too many for starting point. Maybe most of them will be removed later when additional principles will be found.

At least, if the theory is able to count number of possibilities, it's already in top 50% of theories  All these strokes, anagramming, musical notations, ufos, torsion fields, modern forgeries, scribing errors (yes, 70+ times ocurring c*hh, you may be a scribing error!) are absolute мракобесие (rus: obscurantism)

It's clear that the right theory must be analitical and able to explain all the statistical properties of the text. And moreover there still is a good possibility that almost deterministic "neat clean soluition" © Koen does exist.