12-06-2018, 09:10 PM
I appreciate very much your work. It is true because I know what it is to read hours and hours so many medieval masnucripts looking for some clues. I want to tell my experience: At the National Library of Spain where I work, during months I was looking into dozens of manuscripts, most written in Latin, and I realized that some letters were similar to the glyphs of the Voynich. I thought that would end up finding the solution. But one day, I closed the book that I had in my hands and I told me myself: Many learned men were familiar with manuscripts and scribal conventions in the Court of Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor, in the XVII century and they didn't find anything. I thought that if they couldn't decipher a manuscript from the XV century, I won't do it in the XXI century.
And suddenly there is light. I thought: they sent the Voynich to Kircher because suspected that the text was a language like hieroghyphs, something visual rather than phonetic, and Kircher believed to have deciphered the egiptian hieroglyphs.
And suddenly there is light. I thought: they sent the Voynich to Kircher because suspected that the text was a language like hieroghyphs, something visual rather than phonetic, and Kircher believed to have deciphered the egiptian hieroglyphs.

