I have thousands of samples that are similar to the Voynich main text (and the marginalia, as well). It will take me days to gather the most relevant to put them in a chart.
I thought I would point out that we haven't really defined what we mean by the Voynich glyph set. I believe there are two. possibly three, forms of EVA-r, with all three having analogs in medieval Latin. There are also five forms of EVA-m (not just rare characters but glyphs that run throughout the manuscript) and all have analogs in medieval Latin.
Since I only use my own transcripts, and I have created four of them over the last 10 years, I've studied every single glyph in the VMS numerous times and have a better feel for which variations are hand variations and which are intentionally written differently than if I had relied on someone else's transcript.
I thought I would point out that we haven't really defined what we mean by the Voynich glyph set. I believe there are two. possibly three, forms of EVA-r, with all three having analogs in medieval Latin. There are also five forms of EVA-m (not just rare characters but glyphs that run throughout the manuscript) and all have analogs in medieval Latin.
Since I only use my own transcripts, and I have created four of them over the last 10 years, I've studied every single glyph in the VMS numerous times and have a better feel for which variations are hand variations and which are intentionally written differently than if I had relied on someone else's transcript.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)