So I just decided to open a random manuscript - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. - and was able to find the following correspondent glyphs. Mostly the ones in the "final abbreviations" category.
Would the following conclusions be correct?
Would the following conclusions be correct?
- EVA-l is rare as a non-numeral.
- EVA g, m, s, y, n are not particularly rare and generally used for abbreviating.
- Benches are not particularly rare and are generally ligatures.
- It's harder to find regular use of (2) ánd (3) in the same manuscript? (this is just from my very limited experience).
- Gallows still lack a decent parallel that coincides with (2) and (3).


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)