01-04-2018, 12:28 AM
Having read the title post, I was about to object with the qc- examples, but I see that JKP provides much more examples.
... You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. - for sure it's not an o.
I don't remember though if the opposite to what Emma states is true. Anyway, I'd prefer a more strict formulation, like "if a vord X starting with o exists, then a vord qX exists also". In the proposed formulation, the term "counterpart" appears too vague.
... You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. - for sure it's not an o.
I don't remember though if the opposite to what Emma states is true. Anyway, I'd prefer a more strict formulation, like "if a vord X starting with o exists, then a vord qX exists also". In the proposed formulation, the term "counterpart" appears too vague.

