04-03-2016, 02:33 AM
What we see here is a common property of incorrect solutions.
Based on the number of degrees of freedom that the solution includes, one can get only so much 'plain text' out of it.
One degree of freedom everyone has is the mapping of Voynich MS characters to plain text. Here, we also have some nulls, and the additional freedom from anagramming.
Still, this usually does not allow for more than a dozen or so meaningful words.
Any sentences produced as part of any incorrect solution are completely unrelated fragments that make no sense.
People producing more than 10-15 words either have an enormous degree of freedom (Stojko realigning all word breaks and introducing all vowels, or Strong, defining a very large table of character mappings), or they don't show their method at all.
After the first dozen words, it becomes almost impossible to find anything more.
Here: one word picked out of an entire page, referring to a name of a herb that grows on the other side of the planet, and does not look like the illustration at all.
Based on the number of degrees of freedom that the solution includes, one can get only so much 'plain text' out of it.
One degree of freedom everyone has is the mapping of Voynich MS characters to plain text. Here, we also have some nulls, and the additional freedom from anagramming.
Still, this usually does not allow for more than a dozen or so meaningful words.
Any sentences produced as part of any incorrect solution are completely unrelated fragments that make no sense.
People producing more than 10-15 words either have an enormous degree of freedom (Stojko realigning all word breaks and introducing all vowels, or Strong, defining a very large table of character mappings), or they don't show their method at all.
After the first dozen words, it becomes almost impossible to find anything more.
Here: one word picked out of an entire page, referring to a name of a herb that grows on the other side of the planet, and does not look like the illustration at all.