[split] On the study of the imagery vs. study of the text
#4
I think the VMS is potentially a very important historical artifact beyond being simply old and interesting.



If the text is meaningful, it has been expressed in an unusual and creative way.

If there is underlying language of a lost or undocumented nature, it's a rare treasure.


If the text someday verifies some of the plant information, there may be a number of botanical firsts.


While considering all these possibilities, I also try to keep a level head... If the text turns out to be meaningless, there may never be a way to substantiate the various interpretations of the drawings other than by self-reference (patterns within the illustrations that are self-confirmatory) and some parts of the manuscript may resist this kind of analysis.

Even so, it's a fascinating journey... so much to learn along the way regardless of the outcome.


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] On the study of the imagery vs. study of the text - by -JKP- - 04-02-2018, 10:58 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  History of the study Diane 25 27,720 17-11-2018, 07:23 PM
Last Post: davidjackson
  Relation between text study and imagery study Koen G 15 18,583 03-01-2017, 07:37 PM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)