[Panel Session] Cryptologic History panel Oct. 19, 2017
#41
It's a quadruple crayfish and all of the zodiac symbols in the BNF manuscripts are in multiples, not just the crayfish—it's quite different from the VMS. There are 6 and 8 of some of them (Aries has 8, Pisces has 6). Each one is mirrored (except Gemini) and the rest are added as decorative elements to enhance a large swath of landscape.

I really get nervous when things start moving out of context. This thread is about a fraud manuscript and my example was specific to this thread. In the context of a fraud or fake manuscript, adding extra things in a way that no one else does (no one else has created a pair of crayfish in a zodiac series of which the others are not mirrored) not only adds extra work but it could be a flag that the manuscript is "different" or "weird" and those who create fakes don't usually want to go too far off the beaten path because they don't want it to be examined too closely.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Cryptologic History panel Oct. 19, 2017 - by -JKP- - 07-12-2017, 05:56 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Talk] 04 June 2020 Talk on The History of the Book and the History of Cryptography arca_libraria 3 8,178 03-06-2020, 08:15 PM
Last Post: Emma May Smith
  [Conference] 2019 Symposium on Cryptologic History doranchak 6 10,290 30-09-2019, 11:58 PM
Last Post: -JKP-
  [Conference] Crypto history event in Bratislava in 2017: Voynich presentations welcome! kschmeh 11 17,323 13-04-2017, 06:16 PM
Last Post: Anton

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)